SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 333

K.SUBBA RAO, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.R.MUDHOLKAR
Ram M. Vijayalakshmamma Rao Bahadur Ranee of Vuyyur – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :P. Ram Reddy, Advocate
For the Respondent:A.V. Rangam, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Mudholkar, J.

1. By a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894, (I of 1894), dated September 14, 1948 the Government of Madras decided to acquire 1145 grounds of land comprised in an area roughly bounded by St. Mary's Road on the north, by the Buckingham Canal in the east and south and by Chamier's Road and Pugh's Road on the west in the city of Madras. The land belonged to various owners and the acquisition was for the purpose of constructing houses under the Town Planning scheme which had already been settled. Out of these lands 74 grounds belonged to the appellant. The Land Acquisition Officer divided the lands to be acquired into five groups Groups I to Group V according to what he considered to be the best lands, the next best lands and so on. In grading the lands in this manner, the Land Acquisition officer bore in mind factors such as proximity to roads in existence, nearness to the Mylapore temple, the market, schools etc. level of land, its distance from the Buckingham canal (which is said to stink a great deal) as well as distance from pits or ponds and so on. This grading has been accepted throughout and is not challenged before us. What is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top