SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 804

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, N.D.OJHA
Ashok Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER :

E.S. Venkataramiah, J.

1. It is seen from the record that the names of the appellants had been included in the panel prepared by the Public Service Commission and published on 10th July, 1984. The said panel has been quashed by the High Court by the judgment under appeal even though the appellants had not been impleaded as parties to the Writ Petition. We feel that in the facts and circumstances of this case the order of the High Court which prejudically affects the appellants should be set aside and the case should be remanded to the High Court to dispose it of afresh after impleading all the person who had been included in the panel as parties to the petition. We accordingly set aside the judgment of the High Court and remand the case to the High Court to dispose of the case afresh, without being influenced by the judgment of the High Court which has been set aside by this order.

2. If the petitioners in the Writ Petition apply to the Public Service Commission to furnish them the names and addresses of the persons who had been included in the panel dated 10.7.1984 the Public Service Commission shall make such names and addresses available to them to enable them to implead

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top