SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2415

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.S. Verma and B.N. Kirpal, JJ.
Public Union for Civil Liberties - Petitioner
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu and others - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 3922 of 1985 with W.P. (Crl.) No. 153 of 1982, W.P.(C) No. 166 of 1995
Decided On : 23-08-1996

The court discouraged the filing of multiple writ petitions on the same subject matter to avoid unnecessary duplication of legal proceedings.

Headnote:

PIL - Multiplicity of Writ Petitions - The court discouraged the filing of multiple writ petitions on the same subject matter, emphasizing the need to avoid unnecessary duplication of legal proceedings.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition similar to an earlier PIL matter, prompting the court to discourage the filing of multiple writ petitions on the same subject matter.

Finding of the Court:

The court discouraged the multiplication of writ petitions on the same subject matter, emphasizing the need to avoid unnecessary duplication of legal proceedings.

Issues: Multiplicity of writ petitions on the same subject matter.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to avoid unnecessary duplication of legal proceedings and discouraged the filing of multiple writ petitions on the same subject matter.

Final Decision: The court requested senior advocates to examine the matter and report the correct position for making appropriate orders in the writ petition.

JUDGMENT :

W.P. (C) No. 166/95 - Aman Hingoroni v. Union of India & Ors.

1. As stated by the petitioner who appears in person, this writ petition appears to be of the same kind as W.P. No. 3922/85. If that be so, there is no occasion to multiply the number of writ petitions since the earlier writ petition (No. 3922/85) is also a PIL matter dealing with the same subject. Shri Kapil Sibal Shri A.K. Ganguly, Sr. Advocates, who have been requested by us to appear as amicus curiae in W.P. No. 3922/85, are, therefore, requested to examine this matter and report the correct position for making the appropriate orders in this writ petition.

W.P. (C) No. 3922/85, W.P. (Crl.) No. 153/82 and W.P. (C) No. 166/95.

2. List on 4.10.1996.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top