SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2487

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.P. Jeevan Reddy and K.S. Paripoornan, JJ.
Delhi Development Authority - Petitioners
Versus
Skipper Construction and anr. - Respondents
I.A. Nos. 16, 23, 24, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 36, 38 15, 32A 33, 34 and 50, 51-54 in SLP (C) No. 21000 of 1993
Decided On : 19-12-1996

Important Points

The court's decision was guided by the principles of financial accountability, procedural fairness in disciplinary proceedings, and the right of the Embassy to access relevant information for decision-making.

Subject

Civil Law - Property Law

Headnote

Embassy of Israel - Purchase of Building - The court directed the closure of bank accounts of the commission and transfer of surplus amount to the court, extended time for concluding disciplinary enquiries, and allowed the Embassy to access the valuation report for making a decision on the question of valuation.

Fact of the Case:

The court directed the closure of bank accounts of the commission and transfer of surplus amount to the court, extended time for concluding disciplinary enquiries, and allowed the Embassy to access the valuation report for making a decision on the question of valuation.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the closure of bank accounts of the commission and transfer of surplus amount to the court, extended time for concluding disciplinary enquiries, and allowed the Embassy to access the valuation report for making a decision on the question of valuation.

Issues: Bank account closure, transfer of surplus amount, extension of time for disciplinary enquiries, access to valuation report

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need to ensure proper handling of funds, the extension of time for disciplinary enquiries, and the facilitation of the Embassy's decision-making process regarding the valuation of the building.

Final Decision: The court directed the closure of bank accounts of the commission and transfer of surplus amount to the court, extended time for concluding disciplinary enquiries, and allowed the Embassy to access the valuation report for making a decision on the question of valuation.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • administrative law
    • disciplinary proceedings (Para 3)
    • public funds management (Para 2)
  • civil law
    • property law
      • tenancy and purchase (Para 1)
  • practice and procedure
    • interlocutory orders (Para 1, 2, 3, 4)

Table of Contents

1. Purchase of building by tenant — Management of commission funds — Disciplinary proceedings against officers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 )

2. Request for time to respond to building purchase and access to valuation report — Request for extension of time to conclude disciplinary enquiries. (Para 1 , 3 )

3. The court acknowledges the necessity of a valuation report for the tenant's decision and the requirement for additional time to conclude disciplinary proceedings. (Para 1 , 3 )

4. Time granted for response — Valuation report furnished — Commission accounts closed and funds transferred to court — Disciplinary enquiry timeline extended. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 )

5. Can the court extend the timeline for concluding disciplinary proceedings against officers?

Yes, the court may extend the time for concluding disciplinary enquiries upon the request of the government. (Para 3 )

6. Can the court order the transfer of surplus funds from a commission's bank account to the court's registry?

Yes, the court can direct the closure of commission bank accounts and the transfer of surplus funds and cheques to be held by the Registrar in fixed deposits. (Para 2 )

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Ravindra Nath, learned counsel for the Embassy of Israel states hat he requires some time to get the response and to submit the response of the Embassy in the matter of purchase of the building of which it is the tenant. Mr. Ravindra Nath also requests that a copy of the valuation .report submitted by M/s Price Water house may be furnished to him Since it may help the Embassy in making up its mind on the question of valuation. (A copy of the said report has been handed over to Mr. Ravindra Nath in the Court itself). For this purpose, list the matter on 27th January, 1997.

2. The office has put up a report dated 18.12.96 asking for certain orders. As requested by Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti Commission, we direct that the Bank Accounts of the Commission may be closed transmitting the surplus amount of Rs. 1,39,00,503.95p only including the interest thereon to this Court. The two cheques made out in favour of Shri Deepak Batra, Janki Das and others may also be made over to this Court. The said amount shall also be held by the Registrar to the credit of this matter alongwith other amounts which are already lying to the credit of this case. This amount shall also be placed in fixed deposit for a period of one year in a nationalised bank.

3. At the request of the Union of India, the time for concluding the disciplinary enquiries against the officers, (pursuant to the earlier orders of this Court) is extended by three months. It shall be open to the Union of India to bring this order to the notice of the U.P.S.C. and ask for its advice at an early date.

4. List the matter on 27th January, 1997.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top