SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2471

S.P.BHARUCHA, S.C.SEN
Kaur & Singh – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal by the assessee against the judgment and order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, can be disposed of in favour of the appellant on a very short ground.

2. The assessee was issued a notice dated 10th December, 1981, to show cause why a penalty should not be imposed upon it under Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and why Central Excise duty should not be collected from it on goods cleared without payment of the same during the year 1980-81. The notice, it is common ground, was issued after the expiration of the period of six months. It could, therefore, have been issued only upon the basis that the assessee was guilty of fraud or of collusion or of wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts or of contravention of the provisions of the Act or the Rules with intent to evade payment of Excise duty; this because, by the time the show cause notice was issued, Rule 9(2) had been amended to incorporate therein the period specified in Section 11A of the Act. The show cause notice does not set out any particulars in respect of fraud or collusion or wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts or contravention with inte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top