SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1267

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, N.VENKATACHALA
Bikram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


ORDER :

K. Jayachandra Reddy, J.

1. Heard learned counsel.

2. This is an appeal under Section 379 Criminal Procedure Code read with Section 2(A) of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act. There are three appellants [original accused Bikram Singh (A-1), Sukhdev Prasad (A-3) and Sheo Shankar Singh (A-2). They along with one Swami Din Singh were tried for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 225 Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act read with Sections 27/5 of the Arms Act for having committed the murder of Hanumant Singh by firing gunshot on the deceased on December 5, 1972 at about 4.45 p.m. in the village Kurhena. During the same occurrence, they were alleged to have caused injuries to four persons Rahim Khan, Pheran, Pooran and Jagdish]. The prosecution case is that there was enmity between the accused and the deceased. On December 5, 1972, there was a Mela near the Majar of Saiyed Baba. At about 4.45 p.m. when the deceased along with his father Sunder Singh (PW 11) were witnessing the Mela, the accused Bikram Singh suddenly appeared with a gun which belonged to the fourth accused ? father of Bikram Singh. Bikram Singh came ve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top