SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 1189

P.B.SAWANT, N.M.KASLIWAL
Veer Bala – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Administration – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. Mr. M.U. Siddiqui, Deputy Secretary appears for the respondent and states that sanctions for prosecution of the police officials concerned will be communicated to the CBI on or before 23.3.93. Mr. J.P. Varma, D.S.P. is present on behalf of the C.B.I. and states that as soon as the sanctions are received by the C.B.I., they will file the charge-sheets against the concerned police officials. Mr. Virender Kumar Bhalla, brother-in-law of the petitioner is also present.

2. Taking into consideration all the facts on record, we are of the view that the Delhi Administration should give to the petitioner Smt. Veer Bala compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/- within four weeks from today as an immediate measure. Out of the said amount of Rs. 3,00,000/-, Rs. 50,000/- shall be deposited in fixed deposit in any nationalised bank in the names of each of her minor children namely Master Aman Gupta and Ms. Divya Gupta Separately. They will be entitled to the amount deposited in their name with the accumulated interest thereon on their attaining majority. The balance amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- may he utilised by the petitioner for her maintenance as well as the maintenance of the minor children an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top