Back
1997 Supreme(SC) 1896
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.K. Mukherjee, S.P. Kurdukar and K.T. Thomas, JJ.
P.V. Narsimha Rao - Petitioner
Versus
State (CBI/SPE) - Respondent
S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 2966-2967 of 1997
Decided On : 18-11-1997
The interpretation of Article 105 of the Constitution of India is a substantial question of law that requires consideration by a Constitution Bench.
Headnote:
Article 105 - Interpretation of the Constitution of India
Fact of the Case:
A substantial question of law regarding the interpretation of Article 105 of the Constitution of India is raised in the petitions.
Finding of the Court:
The petitions are required to be heard and disposed of by a Constitution Bench.
Issues: Substantial question of law as to the interpretation of Article 105 of the Constitution of India
Ratio Decidendi: The interpretation of Article 105 of the Constitution of India is a substantial question of law that requires consideration by a Constitution Bench.
Final Decision: The Registry is directed to place the petitions before Hon'ble the Chief Justice for necessary orders.
JUDGMENT :
1. Among other questions, a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of Article 105 of he Constitution of India is raised in these petitions. These petitions are, therefore, required to be heard and disposed of by a Constitution Bench. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to place these petitions before Hon'ble the Chief Justice for necessary orders.
