SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.K. Mukherjee, S.P. Kurdukar and K.T. Thomas, JJ.
P.V. Narsimha Rao - Petitioner
Versus
State (CBI/SPE) - Respondent
S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 2966-2967 of 1997
Decided On : 18-11-1997
Article 105 - Interpretation of the Constitution of India
Fact of the Case:
A substantial question of law regarding the interpretation of Article 105 of the Constitution of India is raised in the petitions.
Finding of the Court:
The petitions are required to be heard and disposed of by a Constitution Bench.
Issues: Substantial question of law as to the interpretation of Article 105 of the Constitution of India
Ratio Decidendi: The interpretation of Article 105 of the Constitution of India is a substantial question of law that requires consideration by a Constitution Bench.
Final Decision: The Registry is directed to place the petitions before Hon'ble the Chief Justice for necessary orders.
JUDGMENT :
1. Among other questions, a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of Article 105 of he Constitution of India is raised in these petitions. These petitions are, therefore, required to be heard and disposed of by a Constitution Bench. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to place these petitions before Hon'ble the Chief Justice for necessary orders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.