SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1733

S.B.MAJMUDAR, M.JAGANNADHA RAO
Jawahar Sah – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


ORDER :

S.B. Majmudar, J.

1. Special leave granted.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Accused 2 and 4 have brought in challenge their conviction and sentence awarded by the trial court under Section 304, Part I read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ("Indian Penal Code" for short) and as confirmed by the High Court in appeal. The incident which resulted in conviction of the appellants by the trial court which sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years for the said offence which occurred on 10-8-1977 at 5.30 p.m. Prosecution Witness 5, Gopal Sah clearly implicated both these accused in the said offence. It was found by the trial court and as agreed to by the High Court that Accused 2 had given a spear blow to the deceased Gauri Shankar Sah and Accused 4 had given a blow on the head of the deceased with a sharp-cutting instrument, "garasa". In view of the evidence of PW 5 who had clearly implicated these accused and also in view of the corroborating evidence of PW 3 no exception can be taken to the role played by these accused in causing the death of the deceased.

3. However, the question is whether they could not have been convicted under Sectio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top