SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 2213

S.B.MAJMUDAR, G.B.PATTANAIK, V.N.KHARE, U.C.BANERJEE, R.P.SETHI
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


ORDER :

1. A newspaper report captioned “Krishna talks tough on Almatti dam Says no compromise on height” published in the Times of India on 24.1.2000 is brought to our notice. If this is true, it clearly falls foul on the clear restraint order issued by us on 19.1.2000 which is as under:

    “At this stage when the suite have been taken up for hearing before us, we find it appropriate after hearing learned Counsel for the parties, to direct all the concerned parties that during the pendency of these proceedings before this Court none of the parties to these litigations shall go to the press or take recourse to any other media in respect of their respective cases which are being considered by us.”

2. The aforesaid order was passed on 19.1.2000 in presence of learned Counsel for respective States. Learned senior counsel, Mr. F.S. Nariman assisted by Mr. A.N. Jayaram, Advocate General for the State of Karnataka had taken note of this order for its due compliance by the State of Karnataka. Similarly, learned senior counsel, Mr. K. Parasaran assisted by Mr. A.K. Ganguli, learned senior counsel and Mr. N.V. Ramana, Addl. Adv. General for the State of Andhra Pradesh had taken note of this order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top