SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 2107

R.C.LAHOTI, BRIJESH KUMAR
Harish Sehgal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


ORDER :

1. The property in dispute consists of part of Khasra Nos. 96, 97, 98 and 103 and an old dilapidated building standing over the land in village Dhak Patti, Pargana Central Doon, District Dehradun. It appears that dispute as to possession over the said property erupted between Harish Sehgal (referred to as Party No. 1) and Ms. Lata Gupta (referred to as Party No. 2). The local police intervened and proceedings under Section 145 Criminal Procedure Code were initiated before the City Magistrate, Dehradun. The property was attached under Section 146 Criminal Procedure Code and entrusted to the interim custody of a Receiver on 5.12.1998. On 29.10.1999 the learned City Magistrate passed a final order terminating the proceedings. Party No. 2 was declared to be in possession of the disputed property on the date of preliminary order and two months prior to that. The attachment was ordered to be withdrawn with the result that the party no. 2 became entitled to restoration of possession from the Receiver.

2. Raising a grievance that in spite of the order being in favour of Party No. 2 the operative portion of the order was not happily worded in accordance with clause (a) of sub-section

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top