ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. Mr. Harish N. Salve, learned Solicitor General submitted that the State of Punjab takes objection only in regard to the following observations made in the impugned judgment 2000 (2) PLJ 7:

“This exercise, it appears, has not been done throughout the State of Punjab and Haryana and villages forming part of Union Territory, Chandigarh even though there is a specific provision for doing that:

xxx xxx xxx

This exercise be done as expeditiously as possible and preferably within six months proceedings for repartition must commence. Liberty to apply in the event of non-compliance of directions, referred to above.”

3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objection in deleting the aforesaid portions from the impugned judgment. We allow these appeals to the extent of deleting of the abovesaid passage from the impugned judgment.

4. These appeals are disposed of accordingly.

Appeal disposed of.