SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1741

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.T. THOMAS, S.N. VARIAVA, JJ.
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Gurjant Singh and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 5709 to 5714 of 2001
Decided On : 27-08-2001

Important Points

The court has the authority to delete specific passages from an impugned judgment based on objections raised.

Subject

Civil Law - Appellate Procedure

Headnote

Objection - Impugned Judgment - The court allowed the appeal to the extent of deleting certain observations from the impugned judgment.

Fact of the Case:

The State of Punjab objected to certain observations made in the impugned judgment.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the appeal and deleted the objected passages from the impugned judgment.

Issues: Objection to specific observations in the impugned judgment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the objection raised by the State of Punjab and the agreement of the respondent to delete the objected passages.

Final Decision: The appeals were disposed of accordingly, and the objected passages were deleted from the impugned judgment.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. Mr. Harish N. Salve, learned Solicitor General submitted that the State of Punjab takes objection only in regard to the following observations made in the impugned judgment 2000 (2) PLJ 7:

“This exercise, it appears, has not been done throughout the State of Punjab and Haryana and villages forming part of Union Territory, Chandigarh even though there is a specific provision for doing that:

xxx xxx xxx

This exercise be done as expeditiously as possible and preferably within six months proceedings for repartition must commence. Liberty to apply in the event of non-compliance of directions, referred to above.”

3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objection in deleting the aforesaid portions from the impugned judgment. We allow these appeals to the extent of deleting of the abovesaid passage from the impugned judgment.

4. These appeals are disposed of accordingly.

Appeal disposed of.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top