SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1981

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.P. MOHAPATRA, SHIVARAJ V. PATIL, JJ.
Fahim Khan & Anr. - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Bihar - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 661 Of 2001. (Arising out of Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 4514/2000).
Decided on : 12-05-2001

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. R.K. Jain, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ranjan Dwivedi, Mr. R.S. Sharma and Mr. Feroze Ahmad, advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh and Mr. B.B. Singh, Advocates.

The appellate procedure allows for remittal of a matter to the lower court for disposal on merits in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties.

Headnote:

Remittal - Appellate Procedure - The court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment, and remitted the matter to the High Court for disposal on merits in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties.

Fact of the Case:

The High Court directed the trial court to pass a fresh judgment on the evidence already adduced by the parties after hearing them in accordance with law.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the High Court should have made its independent assessment of the evidence and decided the appeal on merits instead of remitting the matter to the trial court.

Issues: The issue was whether the High Court's decision to remit the matter to the trial court was appropriate in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided that the matter should be remitted to the High Court for disposal on merits in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the judgment under challenge was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the High Court for disposal on merits in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties.

ORDER :

D.P. Mohapatra, J.

Leave granted. We have heard Mr. R.K.Jain, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, learned counsel appearing for the State of Bihar. Our attention is drawn to the direction of the High Court in paragraph 14 of the judgment, which reads as under:

    "In the result, this appeal is allowed and the judgment impugned is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the learned trial court to pass a fresh judgment on the evidence already adduced by the parties after hearing them in accordance with law."

2. Mr. R.K.Jain submits that the High Court having discussed the evidence should have made its independent assessment of the materials on record and decided the appeal on merits instead of remitting the matter to the trial court merely for passing a fresh judgment on the evidence already adduced. Mr. Jain further submits that in the facts and circumstances of the judgment under challenge should be set aside and the matter remitted to the High Court for decision on merits.

3. Learned counsel for the State fairly accepts the position that the matter should be remitted to the High Court for disposal on merits in accordance with law.

4. In view of the agreed position which, in our view, is fair and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, we allow this appeal, set aside the judgment under challenge and remit the matter to the High Court for disposal on merits in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties.

Appeal allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top