SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
U.C. Banerjee, B.N. Agrawal, JJ.
State of Orissa - Petitioner
Versus
Mahima@ Mahimananda Mishra and Ors. - Respondents
CrA.No. 955 of 2002
Decided On : 16-09-2002
Further Investigation - Criminal Procedure - Section 173(8) of the Code - [173(8)] - The court discussed the interpretation of Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and emphasized that the power of the police to conduct further investigation is not restrictive in nature and has the widest possible amplitude. The court held that the provision is for the sake of the concept of justice and if the interest of justice requires, the further power of investigation has been conferred on to the police under Section 173(8) of the Code.
Fact of the Case:
The state appealed against an order of the Orissa High Court which quashed further investigation by the crime branch on the basis of statements of witnesses available to be examined during earlier investigation, citing abuse of process of court and exercise of power not intended to be exercised under Section 173(8) of the Code.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the power of the police to conduct further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code is not restrictive in nature and is for the sake of the concept of justice. The court held that the judgment impugned is erroneous on a reading of Section 173(8) of the Code and allowed the appeal, setting aside the order impugned.
Issues: Interpretation of Section 173(8) of the Code, abuse of process of court, exercise of power under Section 173(8) of the Code
Ratio Decidendi: The power of the police to conduct further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code is not restrictive in nature and is for the sake of the concept of justice. The provision is for the interest of justice and if the interest of justice requires, the further power of investigation has been conferred on to the police under Section 173(8) of the Code.
Final Decision: The appeal is allowed, the order impugned is set aside, and the investigating agency will be at liberty to investigate further as it deems fit and proper in accordance with law.
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. The state is in appeal against an order of the Orissa High Court which, inter alia, records as below:
3. Mr. Das, learned counsel appearing for the state, has been rather emphatic in his submission that the High Court hadn't had the requisite jurisdiction to interfere with an order directing further investigation, since the language of Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as "The Code") is rather clear and categorical in that regard. Section 173(8) of the Code, for proper appreciation, however, is noticed herein below :
4. A plain reading of the language itself suggests that the power of the police to conduct further investigation cannot possibly be restrictive in nature and it is of widest possible amplitude. It is in this context Mr. Das placed reliance on a decision of this Court in Hemant Dhasmana v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, wherein this Court in paragraph 16 observed:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.