SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 2416

G.B.PATTANAIK, S.B.SINHA
Dolphin International Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Gavs Laboratories (P) Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER :

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court upholding the order of a learned single Judge who, in exercise of his jurisdiction under the Companies Act (for short "the Act"), admitted an application for winding up and directed publication of the citation, on the basis of an application filed by the respondent under Sections 433 and 439 of the Act, alleging therein that the appellant-Company is unable to pay the debts. The appellant took the stand that the assertions in the application filed under Section 433 of the Act is wholly incorrect. According to the appellant, the reasons given show why the alleged amount has not been paid is an accounting between the Russion supplier and the respondent and under the terms of agreement some commission was agreed to be paid. The learned Single Judge, however, on examining the materials placed before him, came to the conclusion that a case for winding up has been made out in terms of Sections 433 read 2 with Section 434 (1) (a) of the Act and accordingly directed admission of petition and publicity of citation in question. On an appeal being carried, the Division Bench came to the conclus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top