SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 2156

M.B.SHAH, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
Jagtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Satendra Kaur @ Bhavana Grover – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S. Muralidhar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ajay Kr. Agrawal, Mr. Mahesh Chandra, Mr. Manmohan, Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Mr. M.P. Shorawala, Advocates.

ORDER :

1. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The order passed by the High Court appears to be unusual one. Learned counsel for the State submits that at present the respondents-applicants are absconding. Normally, when the accused are absconding there is no Question of granting anticipatory or regular bail. Admittedly, neither the High Court nor the Sessions Court has granted anticipatory bail in this matter. Hence, it would be open to the Investigating Officer to arrest the respondents.

3. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners the matter is adjounred for four weeks.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top