SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 2070

M.B.SHAH, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
Rajesh Rani – Appellant
Versus
Tej Pal – Respondent


ORDER :

M.B. Shah, J.

Despite service none appears for the respondent.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Considering the facts stated in the transfer petition and the fact that the petitioner wife is staying at Village Balrangran, Tehsil and District Karnal (Haryana), Petition No. 36 of 2000 filed by the respondent husband titled Tej Pal v. Rajesh Rani under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act pending before the Court of District Judge, Una (H.P.) is transferred to the Court of District Judge, Karnal. The District Judge may either try the same or assign it to any competent court for trial.

4. The transfer petition stands disposed of accordingly.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top