Ramdas Athawale vs Union of India - 2004 Supreme(SC) 1792

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2004 Supreme(SC) 1792

S.RAJENDRA BABU, A.R.LAKSHMANAN, S.H.KAPADIA
Ramdas Athawale – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Senior Advocate (H.K. Puri, Ujjwal Banerjee, S.K. Puri and Shiv Gupta, Advocates).
For the Respondent: Soli J. Sorabjee, Attorney General.

ORDER :

S. Rajendra Babu, J.

Issue notice.

2. Issue notice to learned Attorney General also.

3. Learned Attorney General is present in court. He seeks and is allowed four weeks time to obtain instructions.

4. List after four weeks.

5. However, it is clarified that the question shall have prospective bearing and not retrospective in regard to the dissolution of Parliament.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2004 Supreme(SC) 1792

S.RAJENDRA BABU, A.R.LAKSHMANAN, S.H.KAPADIARamdas Athawale – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

S.RAJENDRA BABU, A.R.LAKSHMANAN, S.H.KAPADIA
Ramdas Athawale – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent