SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1810

RUMA PAL, G.P.MATHUR
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
J. P. Electronics Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER

G.P. Mathur, J.

The appellants have challenged the order passed by the High Court permitting the re-export of certain electronic goods at the instance of the respondent.

2. The said goods arrived at the Port at Bombay on 24th July, 2000. The importer was M/s. Rahul Associates but it did not clear the goods. Accordingly a notice was given by the appellants to M/s. Rahul Associates under Section 48 of the Customs Act, 1962. On 17th January, 2001, M/s. Rahul Associates wrote to the Customs Authorities stating that they were unable to clear the goods and that they had no objection if the respondent were allowed to re-export the goods. The respondent also wrote a letter to the Customs Authorities on 6th February, 2001 stating that it was willing to pay all the freight charges and demurrage charges for re-export of the goods. It may be mentioned, at this stage, that the Port Authorities had, in the meanwhile, issued notice on 19th September, 2001 under Sections 61 and 62 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1960 for sale of the goods in order to recover its dues under that Act.

3. On 27th April, 2001 the respondent filed a writ petition before the High Court in which it prayed inter alia, for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top