SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1630

BRIJESH KUMAR, ARUN KUMAR
Ashok Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Neetu Kathoria – Respondent


ORDER :

Brijesh Kumar, J.

Leave granted.

2. By means of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the order passed by the Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court setting aside the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge allowing the writ petition setting aside the election of Respondent No. 1 to the office of the Chairman of Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Bina, District Sagar on the ground that she was not qualified to hold the aforesaid office.

3. The appellant challenged the election of Respondent No. 1 on the ground that she lacks the qualification of being a Bhoswami in the area of Krishi Upaj Mandi on the relevant date as required under sub-section 1(a) of Section 11B of the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972. The other qualification which is essential so as to be elected to any office of the Krishi Mandi is as prescribed in clause 2(a) which requires that the name of the candidate should be included in the list of the voters of the market area and under clause 2(b) one has to be an agriculturist. The case of the appellant was that respondent No. 1 lacked all the above noted qualifications as the cut of date relevant for the purpose of reckoning the above no

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top