SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1950

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Cochin Hotels Co. (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kairali Granites – Respondent


ORDER :

Leave granted.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The appellants have been convicted by all the three courts under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to three months' simple imprisonment and Rs. 5000 as fine. The accused-appellants have surrendered and it is stated that the offence has been compounded by paying the entire dues to the complainant. An application jointly signed has also been filed seeking permission to compound the offence. Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as amended, makes the offence compoundable and we find no ground to reject the prayer for compounding the offence.

4. In the circumstances, we allow these appeals and permit the compounding of offence by setting aside the sentence of imprisonment but in the circumstances we shall maintain the sentence of fine. The appeals are accordingly allowed.

5. As we have allowed the compounding of offence, the applicants shall be released forthwith.

Appeals allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top