SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1937

RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Ruma Pal, J.

Leave granted.

2. The appellant was working with the respondents as a Technical Supervisor in Kurali Telephone Exchange in District Roopnagar, Punjab. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the appellant and two other employees in respect of a common certain facts. The Inquiry Officer held the three employees guilty. Ultimately, the Deputy General Manager, being the Respondent No. 3 herein, imposed a penalty reducing the pay of the delinquent officer by five stages for a period of 5 years with effect from 1st November, 2001 and further directed that the appellant would not earn increment of pay during the period of reduction.

3. According to the appellant, similar punishment was inflicted on the other two employees. Being aggrieved, all three employees filed separate writ petitions before the High Court. The writ petitions of the other two employees were merely dismissed as withdrawn. As far as the appellant was concerned, the High Court not only dismissed the writ petition but also directed the punishing authority to re-consider the punishment imposed in view of the observations of the High Court and held that the maximum penalty of dismissal from serv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top