RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
National Housing Coop. Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
Ruma Pal, J.
The appellant claims that certain land was sold to it by Respondents 5 and 6. Respondents 5 and 6 dispute this contention. On the ground that the land had been acquired without payment of compensation, Respondents 5 and 6 filed an application under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 before the District Judge. The District Judge held in favour of Respondents 5 and 6 by an order dated 6-4-1990. Being aggrieved, the State of Rajasthan, Respondent 1 herein, filed an appeal before the High Court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant moved an application for impleadment. That application for impleadment was kept pending. Without disposing of the application, on 31-7-2001, the States appeal itself was disposed of by the High Court. The appellant filed an application for review. The review application was admitted by the High Court observing that the name of the counsel for the appellant had not been shown on the cause list on the relevant date.
2. While the review application was pending, the appellant sought to file an appeal from the order dated 31-7-2001 before this Court by way of a special leave petition. Incidentally, the State of Rajasth
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.