SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1716

RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
National Housing Coop. Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


ORDER :

Ruma Pal, J.

The appellant claims that certain land was sold to it by Respondents 5 and 6. Respondents 5 and 6 dispute this contention. On the ground that the land had been acquired without payment of compensation, Respondents 5 and 6 filed an application under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 before the District Judge. The District Judge held in favour of Respondents 5 and 6 by an order dated 6-4-1990. Being aggrieved, the State of Rajasthan, Respondent 1 herein, filed an appeal before the High Court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant moved an application for impleadment. That application for impleadment was kept pending. Without disposing of the application, on 31-7-2001, the States appeal itself was disposed of by the High Court. The appellant filed an application for review. The review application was admitted by the High Court observing that the name of the counsel for the appellant had not been shown on the cause list on the relevant date.

2. While the review application was pending, the appellant sought to file an appeal from the order dated 31-7-2001 before this Court by way of a special leave petition. Incidentally, the State of Rajasth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top