2005 Supreme(SC) 1672
RUMA PAL, A.R.LAKSHMANAN, DALVEER BHANDARI
Delhi Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Skipper Construction – Respondent
Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao, Sr. Adv. (AC), Mr. Joseph Vellapally, Sr. Adv.(AC), Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Mr. C.N. Sreekumar
For the Respondents:Mr. Gopal Jain, Mr. Rajeev Kumar, M/s Rajinder Narain & Co., Mr. M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Adv., Mr. S.P. Sharma, Mr. K.P. Singh, Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Mr. Abhishek Attrey, Mr. Shishir Singh, Mr. V.A. Mohta, Sr. Adv., Mr. S.K. Kulkarni, Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Mr. Neelkanth Nayaik, Mr. P.R. Ramashesh, Ms. Naresh Bakshi, Advocates
For the Canara Bank :Mr. Y.P. Narula, Mr. Anil K. Chopra, Advocates
For the Punjab & Singh Bank :Ms. Rashi Malhotra, For M/s SA Shroff & Co., Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, M/s Shikha Dev., P. Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Mr. Sanjay Tyagi, Ms. Rashmi Rai, Mr. Devender Kumar, M/s JBD & Co., Ms. Binu Tamta, Mr. V.K. Verma, Mr. P. Parmeswaran, Mr. BK Prasad, Mr. Ashok Mathur, Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Mr. Ashok K. Srivastava, Mr. Rakash Singh, Mr. Y.P. Mahajan, Mr. S.N. Terdol, Mr. DS Mahara, Ms. Sunita Sharma, Mr. BVB Das, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, Mr.HK Puri, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ujjwal Banerjee, Mr. SK Puri, Ms. Priya Puri, Mrs. VM Chauhan, Mr. Sudhir Kulshreshtha, Sr. Adv, Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Mr. A.N. Singh, Ms. Manjula Gupta, Mr. Vikas Bansal, Mr. Pramod Dayal, Mr. S.K. Gupta, Mr. Naresh Kumar, Mr. Pramod Kumar Yadav, Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Ms. Reena Singh, Ms. Bhakti Pasrija, Mr. T. Mahipal, Ms. Prerna Kumari,Adv Mr. Shri Narain, M/s S. Narain & Co., Ms. Indu Malhotra, Mr. P.K. Goswami,Sr, Mr. Rajiv Mehta, Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Mr. B. Agarwal, Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Ms. Savitri Pandey, Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Ms. Rashmi Singh, Mr. Rajendra Singhvi, Mr. Tejwant Singh respondent-in-person, Mr. Pawan, Ms. Kavita Wadia, Mr. Monoj Goel, Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Mr. R.K. Kapoor, Mr. M.K. Verma, Mr. anis Ahmad Khan, Ms. Kum Kum Sen, Mr. Rajeev Kumar. Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Narender M. Sharma, Mr. T. Anil Kumar, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bakshi, Advocates
ORDER :
1. The subject matter of all these applications is 1156 plots in Greater Noida. Of the 1156 plot holders who had deposited money with the Technology Park Limited (hereinafter /referred to as to 'TPL')before the Bahri Commission, 674 plot holders had asked for refund of the amount deposited and 482 plot holders had persisted with their claims for allotment of plots.
2. The master lay out plan which had originally been prepared by the TPL in respect of all the plots has not been wholly agreed to by the Greater Noida Authority. The Greater Noida Authority is unrepresented before us today.
3. The TPL has agreed to refund the deposits made by the 674 plot holders before the Bahri Commission and also to execute sale deeds in respect of the 482 plots to the plot holders subject to the order of attachment passed by this Court and subject to any dispute of the Greater Noida Authority as to the title. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose of all the applications by the following directions:
(1) TLP will deposit the entire principal amount of the deposits due to be refunded to the 674 plot holders in the course of the day. It is recorded that an amount of Rs
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
