SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1666

RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
Commnr of Income Tax, Jalandhar – Appellant
Versus
Nawanshahar Central Coop. Bank Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER :

Ruma Pal, J.

Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. This Court has consistently held that investments made by a banking concern are part of the business of banking. The income arising from such investments would, therefore, be attributable to the business of bank falling under the head "Profits and Gains of business" and thus deductible under Section 80-P (2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act 1961. This has been so held in Bihar State Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (39 ITR 114), Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-III v. Karnataka State Cooperative Apex Bank (2001 Supp. (2) SCR 35, Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ramanathapuram District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd. (2002 (255) ITR 77.

4. The principle in these cases would also cover a situation where a cooperative bank carrying on the business of banking is statutorily required to place a part of its funds in approved securities. The appeals are accordingly dismissed without costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top