RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
Commnr of Income Tax, Jalandhar – Appellant
Versus
Nawanshahar Central Coop. Bank Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
Ruma Pal, J.
Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. This Court has consistently held that investments made by a banking concern are part of the business of banking. The income arising from such investments would, therefore, be attributable to the business of bank falling under the head "Profits and Gains of business" and thus deductible under Section 80-P (2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act 1961. This has been so held in Bihar State Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (39 ITR 114), Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka-III v. Karnataka State Cooperative Apex Bank (2001 Supp. (2) SCR 35, Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ramanathapuram District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd. (2002 (255) ITR 77.
4. The principle in these cases would also cover a situation where a cooperative bank carrying on the business of banking is statutorily required to place a part of its funds in approved securities. The appeals are accordingly dismissed without costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.