Back
2006 Supreme(SC) 1424
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.K. THAKKER, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, JJ.
NOIDA Entrepreneurs Assocn. - Petitioners
Versus
NOIDA & Ors - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 150 of 1997 With W.P(C) NO. 529 of 1998
Decided on : 28-08-2006
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Dayan Krishnan, (A.C.) Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, (A.C.) Mr. E.C. Vidya Sagar, Ms. Manjula Gupta, Mr. R. Mohan, ASG Mr. And Rao, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. P. Parmeswaran, Mr. R.S. Suri, Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Kumar, Mr. Vijay Kumar, Mr. Ashwani Garg, Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.S. Yadav, Mr. Abhisth Kumar, Mr. Ashok H. Desai, Sr. Adv. Mr. L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Mrs. Deepti R. Mehrotra, Mr. Garvesh Kabra, Mr. Ajay K. Agrawal, Ms. Alka Agrawal, Mr. K.B. Rohatgi, Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Mr. Mahesh Kasana,
The court emphasized the importance of providing a synopsis of the reasons for initiating and dropping departmental proceedings, along with relevant page translations, within a specified timeframe.
Headnote:
Departmental Proceedings - Mrs. Neera Yadav - The court directed the State of Uttar Pradesh to provide a synopsis of the reasons for initiating and dropping departmental proceedings against Mrs. Neera Yadav, along with relevant page translations, within two weeks.
Fact of the Case:
The court directed the State of Uttar Pradesh to provide details on the reasons for initiating and dropping departmental proceedings against Mrs. Neera Yadav, along with relevant page translations, within two weeks.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the State of Uttar Pradesh to provide the required details within two weeks and scheduled the next hearing for 09.10.2006.
Issues: Initiation and continuance of departmental proceedings, subsequent decision to drop the proceedings
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the State of Uttar Pradesh to provide a synopsis of the reasons for initiating and dropping departmental proceedings against Mrs. Neera Yadav, along with relevant page translations, within two weeks.
Final Decision: The State of Uttar Pradesh was directed to provide the required details within two weeks, and the next hearing was scheduled for 09.10.2006.
ORDER :
1. It is stated by Mr. Rajeev Dhawan, learned Amicus-Curiae that five volumes of record purporting to be copies of there cords relating to the departmental proceedings have been filed. Let the State of Uttar Pradesh indicate, by way of synops is, as to what were the reasons which weighed for initiation and continuance of departmental proceedings and there levant pages in the volumes filed before this Court. They shall under take a similar exercise in respect of the subsequent decision to drop the departmental proceedings. This exercises hall be only in respect of Mrs. Neera Yadav. Let these details be filed within two weeks. The English translation of the relevant pages shall also be filed.
2. Call the matters on 09.10.2006.
3. Copies of I.A. Nos. 22-24 be supplied to learned Amicus-Curiae, learned counsel for the State of U.P. and the NOIDA authorities.
4. Response, if any, shall be filed by the next date of hearing.
