SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1536

B.P.SINGH, ALTAMAS KABIR
Vikram Cement – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore – Respondent


ORDER :

1. C.A. No. 1197/2005, C.A. No. 3422/2004, C.A. No. 4149/2004, C.A. No. 4150/2004, C.A. No. 4151/2004, C.A. No. 4152/2004, C.A. No. 4153/2004, C.A. No. 4120-4122/2004, C.A. No. 7175-7189/2004, C.A. No. 6698/2005, C.A. No. 1815/2005, C.A. No. 1613/2005, C.A. No. 2318-2320/2005, C.A. No. 6169-6171/2005, C.A. No. 6514/2005

Delay condoned.

2. We have heard counsel for the parties, and with their consent we dispose of the appeals in the following terms.

3. In all these cases, the only issue before this Court is with regard to the eligibility of Modvat/Cenvat credit on inputs and capital goods used in mines.

4. In so far as the Modvat/Cenvat credit on inputs (explosives, lubricating oils etc.) is concerned, the matter is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Vikram Cement v. CCE reported in 2006 (194) E.L.T. 3. Therefore, the appeals where credit on inputs is concerned, are allowed.

5. As regards the Modvat/Cenvat credit on capital goods, if the mines are captive mines so that they constitute one integrated unit together with the concerned cement factory, Modvat/Cenvat credit on capital goods will be available to the assessee. On the other hand, if the mines are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top