SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1553

ARIJIT PASAYAT, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
Ashoka Kumar Thakur – Appellant
Versus
U. O. I. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. It appears that though an assurance was held out on 28th May, 2006 that there shall not be any pay deduction if the agitating students, intern and Resident Doctors join back their duties. There is deduction of salary 20 for some periods. Though, as noted in our order 31.05.2006 medical services have to be primacy over any other grievance because it ultimately affects the patients and no action which affects the person?s right to get treated 25 which is inseparable from Article 21 of the Constitution 1915 (in short the ‘Constitution’) as held by this Court in Paschim Bengal Khet Mazdoor amity & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr., (1996(4) SCC 37) is to be 30 approved; the fact that the Government itself has as a matter of good gesture suggested that there shall not any pay deduction if the agitating students, intern and Resident Doctors join back duties, the normal and well-known concept of ?No work No pay? shall not be applicable in the background of special feature involved. Therefore, we direct that the payment up to 30th May, 2006 shall not be withheld. We make it clear that this order is being passed since the Doctors had j

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top