ASHOK BHAN, MARKANDEY KATJU
Chhotalal S. Ajmera (HUF) Karta – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This order shall dispose of Civil Appeal No. 2251/2001 and 2272- 2291/2001 filed by the assessee-appellants [for short "the assessee"] and Civil Appeal Nos. 2292/2001 and 2252-2271/2001 filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax [for short "the revenue"] against a common judgment and order dated 28th July, 2000 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in W.P. No. 2191/1999 and other connected writ petitions. For the sake of convenience, the facts are taken from C.A. No. 2251/2001.
2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are : Search of various premises of the assessee and its group was conducted (date not mentioned) followed by another one on 19th November, 1992. Voluminous books of accounts, Rs. 25,000/- in cash and a computer disk were seized. On 12th March, 1993 an order of provisional assessment under Section 132(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [for short "the Act"], as it then stood on the Statute, was passed estimating the undisclosed income of the assessee at 200.60 crores for the Assessment Years 1989-90 to 1993-94.
3. The application filed by the assessee under Section 132(12) of the Act, as we are given to understand, is still pend
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.