SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1464

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RUMA PAL, DALVEER BHANDARI, JJ.
M/s Goetze (India) Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi. - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 1761 of 2006 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 7830 of 2005).
Decided on : 24-03-2006

Headnote:

Deduction Claim - Income Tax - The appellant sought to claim a deduction without filing a revised return, which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's order, leading to the appellant's appeal to the Court. The Court clarified that the power of the Tribunal to entertain a point of law for the first time does not relate to the power of the Assessing Officer to entertain a claim for deduction otherwise than by filing a revised return. The appeal was dismissed, with a clarification that the issue was limited to the power of the Assessing Authority and did not impinge on the power of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. The question raised in this appeal relates to whether the appellant assessee could make a claim for deduction other than by filing a revised return. The Assessment Year in question was 1995-96. The return was filed on 30.11.95 by the appellant for the Assessment Year in question. On 12.1.1998 the appellant sought to claim a deduction by way of a letter before the Assessing Officer. The deduction was disallowed by the Assessing Officer on the ground that there was no provision under the Income Tax Act to make amendment in the return of the income by modifying an application at the assessment stage without revising the return.

3. This appellant's appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was allowed. However, the order of the further appeal of the Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was allowed. The appellant has approached this Court and has submitted that the Tribunal was wrong in upholding the Assessing Officer's order. He has relied upon the decision of this Court in National Thermal Power Company Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise 229 ITR 383, to contend that it was open to the assessee to raise the points of law even before the Appellate Tribunal.

4. The decision in question is that the power of the Tribunal under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is to entertain for the first time a point of law provided the fact on the basis of which the issue of law can be raised before the Tribunal. The decision does not in any way relate to the power of the Assessing Officer to entertain a claim for deduction otherwise than by filing a revised return. In the circumstances of the case, we dismiss the civil appeal. However, we make it clear that the issue in this case is limited to the power of the Assessing Authority and does not impinged on the power of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top