SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1376

ASHOK BHAN, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Unimac India Limited – Respondent


ORDER :

Ashok Bhan, J.

Unfortunately the Tribunal, though the final court of fact, has not recorded the findings after considering the voluminous evidence which was present on the record. Tribunal has not adverted to the evidence present on the record. We are not satisfied with the impugned order. The Tribunal being the final court of fact should have been given considered findings after delving into the evidence which was present on the record. Accordingly, these appeals are accepted and the impugned order of the Tribunal is set aside and the case is remitted back to the Tribunal for passing a fresh order after considering the evidence on record.

2. The Intervention application filed by the CBI is dismissed reserving liberty with the applicant to move similar application before the Tribunal, if so advised and if such an application is maintainable.

The Appeals are allowed in the above terms. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top