SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 2037

ALTAMAS KABIR, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Kapil Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Lalit Kumar Sharma – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Leave granted. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 6th November, 2007 passed by the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court against the common order passed in FAO(OS)No. 443-444 of 2007. The said appeals were directed against the order dated 23rd July, 2007, passed by the learned Single Judge, dismissing the appellant's application, under Order 7 Rule 14, CPC, seeking leave to file additional documents in Probate Case No. 40 of 1999 and Civil Suit No. 1632 of 1996.

2. The learned Single Judge by his said order dismissed the application and the said order was upheld by the Division Bench seemingly on the ground that the matters were ready for hearing and were at the stage of cross examination and, accordingly, such prayer could not be granted.

3. Having heard learned Counsel for the respective parties, we are unable to agree with the decision of the Division Bench as also the Single Bench as we have been informed that the cross-examination has not yet commenced. In such a situation, we see no reason for debarring the appellant from filing the additional documents in support of his claim.

4. We accordingly, allow the appeals and set aside the orders

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top