SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 2059

S.H.KAPADIA, H.L.DATTU, DEEPAK VERMA
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhopal – Appellant
Versus
H. E. G. Limited – Respondent


ORDER :

S.H. Kapadia, H.L. Dattu, Deepak Verma, JJ.

Delay condoned in SLP (C) No. CC 10437 of 2009.

Leave granted.

2. In income tax matters, it is well settled that if the question is not properly framed, then, at times, confusion arises resulting in wrong answers. The present batch of civil appeals is an illustration of the proposition mentioned hereinabove. In the synopsis to the civil appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 18045 of 2009, the question raised by the Department is whether the assessee was entitled to claim interest on interest under the provisions of Section 244-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In our view, on facts, the question framed was totally erroneous.

3. Annexure P-l is income tax computation in civil appeal arising from SLP (C) No. 18045 of 2009. On going through the computation, we find that during Assessment Year 1993-1994, the amount paid by the assessee towards TDS was Rs. 45,73,528. The tax paid after original assessment was Rs. 1,71,00,320. The total of TDS amounting to Rs. 45,73,528 plus tax paid after original assessment of Rs. 1,71,00,320 stood at Rs. 2,16,73,848. In other words, the total tax paid had two components viz. TDS + Tax paid after original assessm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top