SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 1340

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.S. BEDI, C.K. PRASAD, JJ.
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Dalbir Singh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 117 of 2006
Decided On : 31-08-2010

The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity to address the challenge to the vires of Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959.

Headnote:

Arms Act, 1959 - Section 27(3) - Challenge to vires of the provision

Fact of the Case:

The learned counsel for the State of Punjab is unwell. The vires of Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959 may be the subject-matter of challenge in these proceedings.

Finding of the Court:

The court issued notice to the Attorney General to address the challenge to the vires of Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959.

Issues: Challenge to the vires of Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959

Ratio Decidendi: The court found it necessary to address the challenge to the vires of Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959 by issuing notice to the Attorney General.

Final Decision: The court's decision was to issue notice to the Attorney General to address the challenge to the vires of Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959.

ORDER :

1. It is stated that the learned counsel for the State of Punjab is unwell.

2. As the vires of Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959 may be the subject-matter of challenge in these proceedings, issue notice to the Attorney General as well.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top