SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 1223

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ALTAMAS KABIR, CYRIAC JOSEPH, SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, JJ.
Gyana Pattnaik, General Secretary, Tata Refractories Sramik Sangha, District Jharsuguda, Orissa - Petitioner
Versus
State Implemtn. Offr-cum-Lab. Commr., Orissa and Others - Respondents
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 489 of 2011
Decided on : 18-07-2011.

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mukul Rohatgi N. Laud, V. S. Raju, T. N. Rao , Advocates.
For the Respondent:Dhruv Mehta Yashraj Singh Deora, Rajesh Kumar, Ram Krishna, for Mitter and Mitter Co. B. P. Thirphati, Shibashish Misra, Advocates.

Headnote:

Provisions of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 – Claim of compensation – Evidence - Quashing of order - From submissions advanced on behalf of respective parties, it appears that elections of Office Bearers of Union last took place on Although tenure of such Office Bearers was for one year, till today no further elections have been conducted - As a result there is some kind of vacuum, though petitioners claim that they have been continuing in management of Trade Union – Held, Be that as may Court now have to find a way to resolve the impasse which has been created on account of fact that elections could not be conducted and although various submissions have been made with regard to provisions of Trade Unions Act, 1926, as far as election of Office Bearers is concerned there is nothing in said Act to indicate as to who should conduct the elections of Office Bearers and in what manner Moreover having regard to the nature of dispute involved herein - Where different groups are claiming to be Office Bearers of Association Court are inclined to like a pragmatic approach to resolve – Accordingly Court appoint District labour Officer, , as Returning Officer to conduct election of Office Bearers of Tat within a period of twelve weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order - He shall prepare a fresh programmed for conduct of the elections within time specified and shall notwithstanding order passed by High Court, conduct elections in accordance with Bye-laws of Union and by secret ballot - Expenses for election will be borne by Union - Elections are to be conducted on basis of membership as existing in Register of members of Trade Union – Consequently directions given by High Court are set aside and Special Leave Petition is disposed of with aforesaid directions - Petition disposed of

JUDGMENT :

Altamas Kabir, J.

The Special Leave Petition is directed against the final order dated November 1, 2010, passed by the Orissa High Court at Cuttack in Writ Petition No. 10256/2010, wherein the petitioner prayed for quashing of the order dated May 21, 2010, passed by the Labour Commissioner, Orissa, Bhubaneswar, appointing the District Labour Officer, Jharsuguda, as the Returning Officer to conduct the election for the Office Bearers of the Tata Refractories Shramik Sangh, Belpahar, Jharsuguda, which is the only recognised Union of the company. Without going into the rival contentions, the High Court rejected the contention that the appointment of the Returning Officer for conducting the election of the Office Bearers of the Sangh was bad in law and held that the Labour Commissioner had rightly appointed the District Labour, Officer, Jharsuguda, to conduct the aforesaid election for the purpose of proper representation of the workmen of the factory. In the said context, the High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing that the Returning Officer should conduct the election and complete the election process, in all respects, within a period of four weeks from the date of the order, by following the procedure contemplated in the Model Election Rules, vis-a-vis the registered Bye-laws of the Association.

2. The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the said direction by which the Returning Officer was directed to follow the procedure contemplated in the Model Election Rules, which presumably means the Verification of Membership and Recognition of Trade Unions Rules promulgated in 1994.

3. From the submissions advanced on behalf of the respective parties, it appears that elections of Office Bearers of the Union last took place on April 8, 2007, and, although, the tenure of such Office Bearers was for one year, till today no further elections have been conducted. As a result, there is some kind of vacuum, though the petitioners claim that they have been continuing in management of the Trade Union. Be that as may, we now have to find a way to resolve the impasse which has been created on account of the fact that elections could not be conducted, and, although, various submissions have been made with regard to the provisions of the Trade Unions Act, 1926, as far as the election of Office Bearers is concerned, there is nothing in the said Act to indicate as to who should conduct the elections of the Office Bearers and in what manner. Moreover, having regard to the nature of the dispute involved herein. Where different groups are claiming to be the Office Bearers of the Association, we are inclined to like a pragmatic approach to resolve the inpasse. Accordingly, we appoint the District labour Officer, Jharsuguda, as the Returning Officer, to conduct the election of the Office Bearers of the Tats Refractories Shramik Sangh, Belpahar, Jharsuguda, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. He shall prepare a fresh programme for conduct of the elections within the time specified and shall notwithstanding the order passed by the High Court, conduct the elections in accordance with the Bye-laws of the Union, and by secret ballot. The expenses for the election will be borne by the Union.

4. The elections are to be conducted on the basis of the membership as existing in the Register of members of the Trade Union.

5. Consequently, the directions given by the High Court are set aside and the Special Leave Petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions.

6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the District Labour Officer, Jharsuguda, by the parties within July 22, 2011, and for the said purpose, let the copies of the same be made available to the leaned advocates-on-record, for the parties.

Petition disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top