SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 1326

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.V. RAVEENDRAN, A.K. PATNAIK, JJ.
Sterlite Industries India Limited and others - Petitioners
Versus
Union Of India and others - Respondents
SLPs (C) Nos. 28116-23 of 2010. (From the Judgment and Order dated 28-9-2010 in WP No. 5769 of 1997 and WMPs Nos. 8044-46 of 1999, WPs Nos. 15501-502 of 1996, 15503 of 2006 and 16861 of 1998 of the High Court of Madras)
Decided on : 25-02-2011

Headnote:

Condo nation of delay - Central Pollution Control Board – Evidence - High Court, by impugned order has directed closure of the unit - On other hand current report of Central Pollution Control Board seems to suggest subject to certain rectification/pollution control measures, the unit can continue Court have in our order referred to four specific areas where there are serious deficiencies pointed out by Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board – Held, petitioners counsel submits that any pollution to atmosphere is not because of petitioners unit, but could be due to nearby thermal unit and SPIC and other industries - PIL petitioners who are respondents on other hand, contend that pollution levels from the petitioners unit are very high and closure of unit is the only solution - Court find that even NEERI has given some conflicting reports - In view of above Court are of view that an independent assessment of present situation and condition of unit of petitioner, and its effect with reference to environmental pollution by NEERI, after a joint inspection with the officials of Central Pollution Control Board, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board and PIL petitioners will help us to arrive at a decision - Court accordingly appoint NEERI to make a pollution and environment impact assessment and submit their report - Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to NEERI. The petitioner shall meet expenses of NEERI in regard to the investigation and assessment - Pending receipt of report of NEERI, petitioner shall take note of various deficiencies pointed out by Central Pollution Control Board and Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board and suggestions to rectify them and take remedial measures learned counsel for petitioner states that the petitioner has already started taking remedial measures on basis of suggestions made by Central Pollution Control Board and Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board – Order accordingly

ORDER:

R.V. Raveendran, J.

The learned counsel for the Central Pollution Control Board seeks leave to file the affidavit as directed by this Court on 24-1-2011, Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. v. Union of India, SLPs (C) Nos. 28116-23 of 2010 order dated 24-1-2011 (SC) and the same is received in Court and taken on record.

2. Mr V. Gopalasamy, Respondent 1 in SLP (C) No. 28119 of 2010, files counter-affidavit in regard to the report of the Central Pollution Control Board. The same is received in Court and taken on record.

3. The High Court, by the impugned order, has directed closure of the unit. On the other hand, the current report of the Central Pollution Control Board seems to suggest that subject to certain rectification/pollution control measures, the unit can continue. We have in our order dated 24-1-20111 referred to four specific areas, where there are serious deficiencies, pointed out by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board.

4. The petitioner's counsel submits that any pollution to the atmosphere is not because of the petitioner's unit, but could be due to nearby thermal unit and SPIC and other industries. The PIL petitioners who are the respondents, on the other hand, contend that the pollution levels from the petitioner's unit are very high, and closure of the unit is the only solution. We find that even NEERI has given some conflicting reports in July 2003 and March 2005.

5. In view of the above, we are of the view that an independent assessment of the present situation and condition of the unit of the petitioner, and its effect with reference to environmental pollution by NEERI, after a joint inspection with the officials of the Central Pollution Control Board, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board and the PIL petitioners, will help us to arrive at a decision.

6. We accordingly appoint NEERI to make a pollution and environment impact assessment and submit their report. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to NEERI. The petitioner shall meet the expenses of NEERI in regard to the investigation and assessment. Pending receipt of the report of NEERI, the petitioner shall take note of the various deficiencies pointed out by the Central Pollution Control Board and the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board and the suggestions to rectify them and take remedial measures. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already started taking remedial measures on the basis of the suggestions made by the Central Pollution Control Board and the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board.

7. List the matter after eight weeks. Interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top