SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 1247

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.H. Kapadia, CJI., K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan, Swatanter Kumar, JJ.
Democratic Youth Federation of India - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 213 of 2011
Decided On : 13-05-2011

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Deepak Prakash, Adv., Mr. Biju Raman, Adv., Mr. K. Bineesh, Adv., Ms. Usha Nandini, Adv., Ms. Meena C.R., Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jay Savla, Adv., Mr. Sumit Ghosh, Adv., Ms. Renuka Sahu, Adv., For Mizoram: Mr. K.N. Madhusoodhanan, Adv., For Maharashtra: Mr. Shankar Chillarge, Adv., Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv., For Sikkim: Mr. A. Mariarputham, AG.,Sikkim Ms. Aruna Mathur,Adsv. Mr. Yusuf Khan, Adv., Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv., For Haryana: Mr. Manjit Singh,AAG. Ms. Vivekta Singh, Adv., Mr. Tarjit Singh, Adv., Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv., For Jharkhand: Mr. S. Chandra Shekhar, Adv., Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv., For Andhra Pradesh: Ms. C.K. Sucharita, Adv., Ms. Nirada Das, Adv., For Kerala: Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Asdv. Mr. G. Prakash, Adv., Ms. Beena Prakash, Adv., For J&K:Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv., Mr. Suhas Joshi, Adv., Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv. Ms. Prerna Mehta, Adv., Mr. S.S. Ray, Adv., Mr. Rajan Tyagi, Adv., Ms. Rakhi Ray, Adv., Mr. Gopal Subramanium,SG. Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Asdv. Mr. Anand Verma, Adv., Mr. A. Deb Kumar, Adv., Mr. Haris Beeran, Adv., Mr. Anand Verma, Adv., Mr. D. Mohta, Adv., Mr. D.S. Mahra, Advocates.

Headnote:

Constitution of India - Article 21 – Appeal against conviction – Evidence – Jurisdiction - Petitioner submits that it is a serious health hazard and Court has got an obligation to protect human life which is guaranteed under Article 21 of Constitution of India - Further, it was pointed out that its ill-effects have been clearly felt in State of Kerala and its use has been completely banned in that State - Court have gone through report published by Government of Kerala and photographs appearing therein are highly disturbing – Held, Learned Solicitor General of India referred to various reports and findings recorded therein on use - After referring to those reports Court are of considered opinion that a detailed study on all India basis needs to be undertaken by an Expert Committee, so that its ill- effects on human health and environment can be better addressed - Court therefore, appoint a Joint Committee headed by Director General of ICMR and Commissioner to conduct a scientific study on question whether use of would cause any serious health hazard to human beings and would cause environmental pollution - Committee can also co-opt experts from the field of environment as well as public health and also other allied areas - Committee would submit its interim report within eight weeks from today and also would suggest any alternative Till the report is submitted, keeping in mind various judgments of this Court under Article 21 of Constitution of India, particularly keeping in mind precautionary principle Court hereby pass an ad-interim order to immediate ban production use and sale of all over India and Court further direct statutory authorities to seize the permit given to manufacturers of till further orders – Order accordingly

ORDER :

1. This Writ Petition is moved in public interest highlighting the harmful effects caused by the continued use of Endosulfan on human beings and on the environment. Endosulfan is now used as a pesticide for the production of crops like paddy, sugarcane, cotton, mango, cashew etc. Few studies have been conducted in this area and its adverse effects on human health and environment has been reported. Some of the studies also indicate that Endosulfan is significantly associated with Neuro-behavioral disorders, Cognitive disorders, Hydrocephalus, Mental Retardation, Cortical blindness, Seizure disorders, Parkinson's disease etc.

2. Petitioner submits that it is a serious health hazard and the Court has got an obligation to protect human life, which is guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Further, it was pointed out that its ill-effects have been clearly felt in the State of Kerala and its use has been completely banned in that State. We have gone through the report published by the Government of Kerala and the photographs appearing therein are highly disturbing.

3. Right to life, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, is the most fundamental of all human rights, and any decision affecting human life, or which may put an individual's life at risk, must call for the most anxious scrutiny.

4. We have heard learned senior counsel Mr. Krishnan Venugopal appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Gopal Subramanium, Solicitor General of India and Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, learned senior counsel appearing for the Pesticides Manufacturers & Formulators Association of India and others.

5. Learned Solicitor General of India referred to the various reports and the findings recorded therein on the use of Endosulfan. After referring to those reports, we are of considered opinion that a detailed study on all India basis needs to be undertaken by an Expert Committee, so that its ill- effects on human health and environment can be better addressed.

6. We, therefore, appoint a Joint Committee headed by the Director General of ICMR and the Commissioner (Agriculture) to conduct a scientific study on the question whether the use of Endosulfan would cause any serious health hazard to human beings and would cause environmental pollution. The Committee can also co-opt experts from the field of environment as well as public health and also other allied areas. The Committee would submit its interim report within eight weeks from today and also would suggest any alternative to Endosulfan. Till the report is submitted, keeping in mind the various judgments of this Court under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, particularly keeping in mind the precautionary principle, we hereby pass an ad-interim order to immediate ban the production, use and sale of Endosulfan all over India and we further direct the statutory authorities to seize the permit given to the manufacturers of Endosulfan till further orders.

7. Place this matter in the second week after the ensuing summer vacation.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top