SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 1497

R.M.LODHA, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
Satyanarayana Construction Co. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


ORDER :

This is an appeal from the judgment passed by the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court on April 8, 2005.

2. Appellant M/s. Satyanarayana Construction Co. (for short "contractor") was awarded a contract for earth work in formation and miscellaneous works from Ch. 24150 M to Ch. 27700 M between Dharur and Rukmapur stations. The work was to be completed by the contractor by May 21, 1997 but it was extended from time to time and the last date for completion of the work, as per extended time, was March 31, 1998. According to the contractor, except for few minor works that remained to be verified, it completed the work by March 31, 1998 but the respondents did not pass the final bill.

3. For resolution of the disputes in relation to the above contract, the contractor sought appointment of an Arbitrator but the Arbitrator was not appointed by the respondents. The contractor, then, approached the Chief Justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court by filing an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "1996 Act"). After hearing the parties, the Chief Justice allowed the application made by the contractor under Section 11 of the 1996 Ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top