SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 1369

S. H. KAPADIA, K. S. P. RADHAKRISHNAN, SWATANTER KUMAR
Honda Siel Power Products Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ajay Vohra and Kavita Jha, Advocate.

ORDER :

S.H. Kapadia, CJI., K.S.P. Radhakrishnan, Swatanter Kumar, JJ.

In our view, the reopening of assessment is fully justified on the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. However, on the merits of the case, it would be open to the Assesses to raise all contentions with regard to the amount of Rs. 98.46 lakhs being offered for tax as well as its contention on Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

3. Subject to the above, the special leave petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top