SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 1479

M.K.SHARMA, ANIL R.DAVE
Toyato Kirloskar Motor Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise – Respondent


ORDER :

M.K. Sharma, Anil R. Dave, JJ.

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court on 7.12.2009 whereby the High Court after setting aside the orders passed by the Tribunal and other authorities, remitted the entire disputes to be considered by the Adjudicating Authority and then to record a finding with regard to the fact as to whether or not the incidence of duty has not been passed on to the customers by the Appellant herein for considering the refund claim of the Appellant.

2. The aforesaid findings and the conclusions have been recorded by the Tribunal after analyzing the fact that a certificate dated 10.5.2001 issued by the Chartered Accountant was produced before the Adjudicating Authority but subsequently another certificate was produced which is dated 17.6.2002 issued by another Chartered Accountant, namely, Sh. Om Prakash, which is subsequent to the order of Adjudicating Authority. Consequently, the High Court held that since the subsequent certificate, which was pressed into service before the Tribunal, was admittedly not : available before the Adjudicating Authority and, therefore, the matter has to be rem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top