SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 1444

M.K.SHARMA, ANIL R.DAVE
Grasim Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise – Respondent


ORDER :

M.K. Sharma, Anil R. Dave, JJ.

By this judgment and order, we propose to dispose of this appeal, which is filed by the Appellant being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 18-2-2003 [2003 (153) E.L.T. 694 (Tri. - LB)] passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal') affirming the order dated 3-12-2001 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the order of the Assistant Commissioner, who had passed the order in original.

2. Counsel appearing for the Appellant has submitted before us that the Respondent could not have issued a show cause notice to the Appellant demanding recovery of the amount which was paid to the Appellant by the Respondent as refund of the duty paid bypassing the statutory provision. The next contention which is raised before us is that the Appellant had issued a credit note which was filed and, therefore, the refund which was given to the Appellant by the Department should have been upheld by all the authorities.

3. The aforesaid submissions of the counsel appearing for the Appellant were, however, refuted by the counsel appearing for the Respondent, who has drawn our attention to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top