SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 1287

H.L.DATTU, MADAN B.LOKUR
All India Judges Asson. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:A.T.M. Sampath, T.S. Shanthi, Sunil Kumar Jain, Sach in Sharma, Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv., Raja Chatterjee, G.S. Chatterjee, Sunil Kumar Jain, Vipin Kumar Jai, Shrish Kumar Mishra, A. Raghunath, Rana Ranjit Singh, Vivek Kr. Singh, Jaswant Singh, Manoj K Mishra, M.K. Verma, V.K. Mishra, Ambhoj Kumar Sinha, Puneet Jain, Ajay Veer Singh, R.K. Verma, Divya Garg, Atul Agrawal, Krishti Jain, Mohammed Irshad Hanif, Parveen Kr. Aggarwal, Surender Singh, Gaurav Gupta, U.P. Singh, Sanjay Jain, Vinay Kumar Garg, Vivek Sharma, B.V. Deepak, Dilipillai, Adv. for M/s T.T.K. Deepak & Co., K.N. Madhusoodnan, T.G.N. Nair, T.G.N. Nair, Anjani Aiyagiri, A. Subhashini, K. Ramamoorthy,Sr. Adv., N. Shobha, Sriram J Thalapathy, V. Adnimoolam, Shilp Vinod, S.P. Sabharwal, B.H. Marlapalle, Sr. Adv., Shrish K Deshpande, Sibo Shanker Mishra, Sanjay Parikh, Mamta Saxena, Bushra Parveen, A.N. Singh, N Vidya, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Gopal Singh, Manish Kumar, Chandan Kumar, Gopal Singh, Ritu Raj Biswas, Kuman Shashank, Adv. for M/s. Parkeh & Co., Wasim A Quadri, Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv., D.S. Mahra, Priyanka Ashok, G. Dara, S.S. Rawat, Manish Goswami, Adv. for M/S. Map & Co., G.N. Reddy, Anil Srivastav, Ritu Raj, L.N. Rao, Sr. Adv., Preetesh Kapur, Hemantika Wahi, Preeti Bhardwaj, Manjit Singh, Tarjit Singh, Vinay Kuhar, Nupur Choudhary, Kamal Mohan Gupta, Naresh Kumar, V.N. Radhupathy, Ramesh Babu M.R., Sapam Biswajit Meitei, KH. Nob in Singh, Krishnanand Pandey, Amrendra Kr. Choubey, Arvind Verma, Sr. Adv., Shivali Chaudhary, Damini, Deepika, C.D. Singh, Ranjan Mukherjee, T.V. Ratnam, P.V. Yogeshwaran, B. Balaji, R. Rahesh Sharma, S. Anand, A. Selvin Raja, Shibashish Mishra, P.I. Jose, Alok K Prasad, Vishwanath Bahuguna, Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Milind Kumar, Aruna Mathur, Yusuf, for M/s. Arputham Aruna & CO., Gaurav Dhingra, Anip Sachthey, Mohit Paul, Shagun Matta, Saakaar Sardana, D.K. Sinha, Ruchi Kohli, Rachna Shrivastava, Pratiksha Chaturvedi, Ratan Kumar Choudhary, Rajiv Nanda, Aniruddha P. Mayee, Charudatta Mahindrakar, Ashok Mathur, Asha Jain Madan, M.R. Shahmshad, T. Mahipal, Suryanarayana Singh, Pragati Neekhra, R. Venkatramani, Sr. Adv., V.G. Pragasam, S.J. Aristotle, Prabhu Ramasubramanian, A. Sumathi, Abhijit Sengupta, Avijit Bhattacharjee, Shibashish Mishra, Rajiv Nanda, Sushma Suri, Sidharth Luthra, Mukul Gupta, Sr. Adv., S. Wasim A Qadri, Priya Hingorani, Zail Ali, Anjali Chauhan, Suvarna Kashyap, Aseem Swaroop, Gurmohan Singh Bedi, Bhakti Pasrija, T.A. Khan, B.V. Balramdas, Anil Katiyar, A.D.N. Rao, Santosh Mishra, Sharmila Upadhyay, Naresh Kumar Sharma, Ajay Bansal, Kuldip Singh, Pardaman Singh, Gaurav Yadav, Ajay pal, V.N. Raghupathy, Ashok K shrivastava, D.K. Sinha, R. Satish, P.I. Jose, Abhijit Sen Gupta, G. Prakash, Nupur Singhal, Naresh Bakshi, R.N. Jena, Bharat Sangal, M.R. Shamshad, Kirti Misra, Balaji Srinivasan, Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Imtiaz Ahmed, Ashok K. Srivastava, P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv., Abhist Kumar, Archana Singh, K Enatoli Sema, Amit Kumar Singh, Advocates.

ORDER :

H.L. Dattu, Madan B. Lokur, JJ.

I.A. No. 201 of 2006 in W.P. (C) No. 1022 of 1989

1. Shri A.T.M. Sampath, learned counsel for the applicant(s) seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this I.A. with liberty to file appropriate application for appropriate relief at an appropriate time.

2. Permission sought for is granted.

3. I.A. No. 201 of 2006 in W.P.(C) No. 1022 of 1989 is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate application for appropriate relief at an appropriate time.

I.A. No. 1 in I.A. No. 201 of 2006 in W.P. (C) No. 1022 of 1989

4. Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submits that in view of the withdrawal of I.A. No. 201 of 2006, I.A. No. 1 in I.A. No. 201 of 2006 has become in fructuous.

5. Taking on record the statement so made by learned counsel, we disposed of I.A. No. 1 in I.A. No. 201 of 2006, as having become in fructuous.

I.A. No. 1 of 2008 in I.A. No. 213 of 2007

6. By order dated 01.10.2013, we had permitted the applicant to make an appropriate representation before the Ministry of Finance, Government of India.

7. The applicant thereafter had made a representation before the concerned authorities.

8. Shri Siddharth Luthra, learned Additional Sol

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                whatsapp-icon Back to top