JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, ARUN MISHRA
Dhaya College of Engineering – Appellant
Versus
Anna University – Respondent
ORDER :
Having given our thoughtful consideration to the controversy in hand and having heard the learned Attorney General representing respondent Nos.1 to 7, we are of the view that the petitioner-institution having been granted recognition by the AICTE as far back in 2011, has been struggling to commence the first academic session. The commencement has been delayed, on account of the Anna University having not granted the necessary affiliation. Paragraph 4.9 of the impugned order depicts some deficiencies. We feel that the objections contained in paragraph 4.9 should not act as an impediment to the commencement of the academic session, and accordingly, we find it appropriate to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to commence the academic session within one week from today by adhering to the different steps laid down by this Court. The counselling shall be conducted on the basis of the merit list prepared by the concerned competent authority, for which a Notification shall positively be issued by tomorrow i.e. 14.08.2014. The students who have already been admitted to other institutions, will not have the option to seek admission in the petitioner-institution.
2. The coun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.