SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1664

KURIAN JOSEPH, ARUN MISHRA
Director (Thrisul Project) Drdo, A. P. – Appellant
Versus
P. B. Varalakshmi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:P.S. Narsimha, Sr. Adv., Gunturu Prabhakar, K. Subba Rao and B. V. Balaram Das, Advocates.
For the Respondent: None.

JUDGMENT :

Leave granted.

2. The family pension and pensionary benefits have been withheld apparently on account of dispute between legal heirs of the deceased. It appears that during the pendency of the proceedings before the High Court the parties have entered a compromise and therefore that dispute has been given quietus.

3. Learned Additional Solicitor General submits that in terms of the rules the amount can be disbursed only to the nominee, who is the widow. Now that the intense dispute between the wife and the daughter has been settled, we dispose of this appeal with the direction to the appellant to disburse the eligible benefits to the widow nominee who shall distribute the benefits in terms of the compromise between her and her daughter. The dues shall be disbursed with interest @ 10 per cent which is the statutory rate fixed under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

4. The Appeals are disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top