SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1651

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, JJ.
Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences & Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & Anr. - Respondents
Writ Petition(Civil) No. 414 of 2015
Decided On : 18-08-2015

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mariarputham, Sr. Adv., S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Bina Madhavan, Praseena Elizabeth Joseph and Lawyer S. Knit & Co., Advocates.
For the Respondents:Tushar Mehta, ASG, Pinky Anand, ASG, Ajay Sharma, Rekha Pandey, R.S. Nagar, D.S. Mahra, Gaurav Sharma, Prateek Bhatia and Amandeep Kaur, Advocates.

The court's decision was influenced by the decision of the Medical Council of India to renew permission for admission of second batch of MBBS students against increased intake under Section 10A of the IMC Act, 1956.

Headnote:

Additional Documents - Medical Council of India - The court allowed the interlocutory application for permission to file additional documents and noted the decision of the Medical Council of India to renew permission for admission of second batch of MBBS students against increased intake under Section 10A of the IMC Act, 1956.

Fact of the Case:

The court allowed the interlocutory application for permission to file additional documents and noted the decision of the Medical Council of India to renew permission for admission of second batch of MBBS students against increased intake under Section 10A of the IMC Act, 1956.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the grievance of the petitioner had been redressed and disposed of the writ petition.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the decision of the Medical Council of India to renew permission for admission of second batch of MBBS students against increased intake under Section 10A of the IMC Act, 1956.

Final Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

The interlocutory application for permission to file additional documents is allowed.

2. Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Additional Solicitor General, has handed over to us a copy of communication No. MCI-37(1)(RI-89)(UG)/2014-Med./127/90 dated 17th August, 2015, which is addressed to the Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. In this communication, it is mentioned that the Executive Committee of the Medical Council of India (hereinafter referred to as MCI) in its meeting held on 17th August, 2015, has decided to renew the permission for admission of second batch of MBBS students against the increased intake, i.e., from 100 to 150 under Section 10A of the IMC Act, 1956, in respect of Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Pondicherry, under the Pondicherry University for the academic year 2015-2016.

3. Ms. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General who is appearing for the Union of India, has also been handed over a copy of the said communication.

4. Once, this resolution is passed by the MCI, we expect the Central Government to take immediate decision thereon preferably within one week.

5. We place on record that the MCI has taken the aforesaid decision in the peculiar facts of this case. Since the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top