SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1668

M.Y.EQBAL, C.NAGAPPAN
Life Insurance Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
R. Basavaraju Alias Basappa – Respondent


ORDER :

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2011 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore in W.A. No. 909 of 2006(S) whereby the Division Bench partly allowed the Writ Appeal of the respondent preferred against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 8386 of 2003 dated 6.3.2006 dismissing the Writ Petition.

4. This is one of the exceptional case where the High Court, while ignoring all the principles of law laid down by this Court and many other High Courts with regard to the adjudication of dispute relating to date of birth of an employee, passed the impugned judgment.

5. From the facts it reveals that the respondent entered into the service of the appellant - Life Insurance Corporation of India (in short 'the Corporation') on 19th November, 1986. His date of birth was recorded in the service record as 3.2.1943 on the basis of the Secondary School Leaving Certificate (SSLC). After about ten years of his appointment, sometime in July, 1996, the respondent asked for change of date of birth by making it 16.2.1945. The said

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top