SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1601

RANJAN GOGOI, PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
Justice V. S. Dave President, The Association of Retd. Judges of Supreme Court And High Courts – Appellant
Versus
Kusumjit Sidhu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. M.R. Calla, Sr. Adv., Mr. P.H. Parekh, Sr. Adv., Mr. Rukhmani S. Bobde, Adv., Mr. Vishal Prasad, Adv., Mr. Abhishek V. Deshmukh, Adv., Ms. Himanjali Gautam, Adv. For M/s. Parekh & Co., Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Ranjit Kumar, SG Mr. A.P. Mayee, Adv., Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv., Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv., Mrs. Rekha Pandey, Adv., Mr. B.V. Balram Das, Adv., Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Adv., Mr. A. Selvin Raja, Adv., Mr. A. Mariarputham, Adv., General Ms. Aruna Mathur,Adv., Mr. Avneesh Aruputham, Adv., Ms. Anuradha Arputham,Adv., Mr. Yusuf, Adv., Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG, Mr. Tushar Bakshi, Adv., Ms. Vartika Sahay, Adv., Ms. Archana Srivastava, Adv., Mr. Mahesh K. Adv., Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv., Ms. Jesal Wahi, Adv., Mr. Nishant R. Katneswkar, Adv., Mr. Arpit Rai, Adv., Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Adv., Mr. Ramesh Babu M.R., Adv., Mr. M.R. Shamshad, AOR Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv., Mr. Aditya Samaddar, Adv., Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Adv., Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv., Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv., Mr. V.G. Pragasam, Adv., Mr. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv., Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv., Mr. Z.H. Isaac Haiding, Adv., Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Adv., Mr. Parikshit P. Angadi, Adv., Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv., Mr. Shivam Singh, Adv., Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv., Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adv., Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv., Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Mohd. Waquas, Adv., Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv., Mr. T.K. Singh, Adv., Mr. Pragyan Sharma, Adv., Mr. Shikhar Garg, Adv., Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, Adv., Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Adv., Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Adv., Mrs. G.Indira, AOR, Mr. Balasubramanian, Adv., Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG, Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv., Ms. S. Pandana Reddy, Adv., Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv., Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv., Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. G.M. Kawoosa, Adv., Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv., Ms. Astha Sharma, Adv., Mrs. K. Enatoli Sema, Adv., Mr. Edward Belho, Adv., Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Anil Shrivastav, Adv., Mr. Ritu Raj, Adv., Mr. Soumitra G. Chaudhuri, Adv., Mr. Parijat Sinha, Adv., Mr. B. Balaji, Adv., Ms. R. Shase, Adv., Mr. Pratp Venugopal, Adv., Mr. Anuj Sarma, Adv., Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Adv., Mr. Arpit Rai, Adv., Mr. Sanjeeb Panigrahi, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Tripathi, Adv., Mr. Ajit Bhattacharjee, Adv., Ms. Upma Shrivastava, Adv., Mr. Arun Kumar, AAG Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv., Mr. K.P. Kylasanatha Pillay, Adv., Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, Adv., Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. V.G. Pragasam, Adv., Mr. Ashok Kumar Juneja, Adv., Mr. Chand Qureshi, Adv., Ms. G. Indira, Adv., Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv., Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv., Mr. Parijat Sinha, Adv., Mr. Ramesh Babu M.R., Adv., Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

We have read and considered the counter affidavits/responses filed by the States With regard to the implementation of the directions contained in paragraphs 33 and 34 of the judgment and order dated 31.03.2014 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (C) No. 521 of 2002 [P. Ramakrishnam Raju v. Union of India & Ors.] and other connected matters. The aforesaid two paragraphs of the order of the Court are extracted below:

    Para 33:- It is brought to our Notice that in pursuance of the said resolution, most of the States in the Country have extended various post-retiral benefits to the retired Chief Justices and retired Judges of the respective High Court. By G.O.Ms. No. 28 dated 16.03.2012 issued by Law Department of Andhra Pradesh sanctioned an amount of Rs. 14,000/- per month to the retired Chief Justices of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh and an amount of Rs. 12,000/- per month to the retired Judges of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh for defraying the services of an orderly, driver, security guard etc. and for meeting expenses incurred towards secretarial assistance on contract basis and a residential telephone free of cost With number of free calls to the extent of 1500 pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top