SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1491

ANIL R.DAVE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Delhi Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Samir Ali Khan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Anil R. Dave, J.

Leave granted.

2. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case we are of the view that the respondent should not have been granted back wages.

3. It is also pertinent to note that the respondent did not lead any evidence to show that he did not work when he was not in service of the appellant during the pendency of the matter. Therefore, in our opinion, it would be just and appropriate not to award any back wages to the respondent.

4. For the aforesaid reason, the impugned judgment and order is modified to the effect that no back wages shall be awarded to the respondent.

5. Appeal stands disposed of as allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top