SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P. Jaganmohan Reddy and D.G. Pelekar, JJ.
Himachal Pradesh Administration - Appellant
Versus
Shri Om Prakash - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 67 of 1969.
Decided On : 7-12-1971
Evidence Act – Section 27 – Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 126 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 – Offence of murder – Order of Acquittal – Appeal by Special leave against the judgment of Himachal Bench of High Court of Delhi acquitting accused who had been sentenced to death for an offence of murder under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code. – Held, Where a person who is not a hardened criminal is burdened with guilt of a gruesome crime is confronted with a tell tale finding possibility of his making a clean breast of what is weighing heavily on him cannot be ruled out. – It is difficult to generalise as to what a man may or may not do after committing a ghastly murder nor can there be any infalliable test to determine course of human reaction, conduct or behaviour in a given situation which might manifest itself in various ways. – In this case when accused was confronted with button of his coat he gave information leading to incriminating discoveries – It may be remembered that P.W. 11 was making knives which he was selling and it is not unknown that persons who make knives or other implements can recognise them with some amount of certainty even though special identification marks may not be present. – Be that as it may, even if identification is discarded there is nothing to doubt his statement that he knew accused before 30th January, 1967 and that about noon on that day he had purchased a dagger from him. – It is not unreasonable to infer that dagger which he purchased is dagger which was recovered on information furnished by accused himself on second day after his purchase and that dagger contained human blood. – One other important circumstance against accused is that blanket that was found in his house which had human blood stains thereon. – Murder of deceased was in January in coldest months in Simla and possibility of accused having taken a blanket to cover himself also fits in with other evidence adduced by prosecution. – There is in court’s view no justification for High Court in jettisoning this cogent evidence of a conclusive nature on mere conjectures and on omnibus ground that witnesses were not independent or impartial which as court have shown is without justification. – Evidence in this case is sufficient to justify conviction of accused for an offence of murder. – Court accordingly set aside judgment of acquittal of High Court, convict accused under Section 302 and sentence him to life imprisonment – Appeal Accepted
JUDGMENT
P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J. - This appeal by Special leave against the judgment of the Himachal Bench of the High Court of Delhi acquitting the accused who had been sentenced to death for an offence of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused respondent was a Manager at the Kotkhai Branch of Himachal Pradesh State Cooperative Bank of which Sunder Lal Chaturvedi the deceased was the General Manager. It appears that during the period the accused was working in that Bank there was a fire in the Kotkhai Branch in which the records of the Bank wee burnt and a sum of Rs. 10,000/- was found missing. The deceased had suspended the accused from the service and subsequently he was dismissed. In or about 1964, the deceased retired from the Bank and in 1965 started a Private Limited Company under the name of Himprasth Financiers with the Head Office at Nagina Singh Building which was situated in the Mall at Simla of which he was the Managing Director. He used also to live in the same building in one of the rooms of the office and have his means at the Mansarover Hotel. The other Directors of this Company were Gurcharan Singh, Puran Chand Sood and Kailash Devi wife of I.C. Gupta, P.W. 2, who was at one time also Manager in the Himachal Pradesh State Cooperative Bank. After the accused was dismissed from the Bank he had applied to the deceased for a job and was appointed as an Accountant in the Finance Company but later when his request for increase in his pay was not sanctioned, he sent in his resignation by a letter dated 31st December, 1966 Exhibit P.8 and it was accepted on 3rd January, 1967 by a resolution of the Board of Directors Exhibit P. 43. On the night of 30th January, 1967 the deceased had his dinner at the Hotel and when he came out after taking his food it was alleged that he was met by the accused. This was witnessed by Remesh Chand P.W. 7 the Proprietor of the Hotel who saw them both going towards the Mall. Thereafter at the betel shop which is near Nagina Singh Building, Lal Chand P.W. 2 who was purchasing cigarettes at that shop saw them together and going towards the Nagina Singh Building. It was the last time he was seen alive. On the 31st January, 1967 at about 9.30 A.M., I.C. Gupta, P.W. 2, came to visit the deceased and found that the main door was bolted from inside. He then peeped through the glass of the widow panes through the adjoining room and saw that the deceased was lying in a pool of blood. He immediately telephoned to the Police. In response to this call the Station House Officer of the Saddar Police Station, Inder Raj Malik, P.W. 28 came to the building, broke open the room through kitchen door and saw that the back door of the bath room was open. At that time there were present P.W. 2, Amar Chand, P.W. 8, Baldev Krishnan P.W. 13 and others. The deceased had on him four incised wounds one on the neck and 3 on the hands. On inspection of the room he found on the nearby table a key Exhibit 4 stained with blood and under the table there was a biscuit colour Coat button Exhibit 1. Inside the shelf of an Almirah there was a water flask which appeared to have on its neck 3 finger impressions. On the glass pane of the door leading to the kitchen were also found two finger marks. The curtain near the kitchen door showed that someone had wiped his blood stained hands on it. The key and the button were seized and a panchnama was made. There were also found two bunches of the key underneath the pillow of the deceased. Des Raj, P.W. 6, the Police Photographer, took photographs, not only of the various objects in the room but also of the finger marks on the flask and the window panes after the same were dusted with some grey powder. Thereafter the Investigating Officer P.W. 28 requested P.W. 2, P.W. 8 and P.W. 13 to ascertain if any of the things belonging to the deceased were missing. These three persons informed him after inspection that two loan registers one general ledger, one cash book
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.