SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1437

FAIZAN UDDIN, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Muthuswami Nadar – Appellant
Versus
Ramakrishnan Nadar – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal at the instance of the plaintiffs has been directed against the judgment dated 16th December, 1986 passed by the High Court of Madras in Second Appeal No. 1977 of 1977, affirming the judgment of the first Appellate Court dated 9.9.1977 whereby the judgment and degree passed by the Trial Court were reversed. The plaintiffs-appellants had instituted the suit for partition of the suit land on the basis of the three Sale Deeds one of which is said to have been executed by Inkupillai and Muthupillai - sons of Perumal in respect of their shares, in favour of the third appellant. The two other Sale Deeds were executed by Rosammal and Mariammal, in favour of the first appellant and the second appellant respectively. The suit was resisted by the respondent on the ground that Rosammal and Mariammal did not inherit any interest in the land and, therefore, Sale Deeds executed by them were invalid. The Trial Court on evaluation of the evidence took the view that the vendors of the plaintiffs had inherited an interest in the land in question and therefore, the sales effected by them were valid. These findings were reversed by the first Appellate Court on the assumption t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top